Wednesday, October 28, 2026

Dasuki’s Trial: Defendants Made Their Statements Without Duress, Under Caution — Witness

The third prosecution witness (PW3), Salihu Kadiri, in the trial of former National Security Adviser (NSA), Colonel Sambo Dasuki (retd), alongside Aminu Baba Kusa, Acacia Holdings Limited, and Reliance Referral Hospital Limited, on Wednesday, April 22, 2026, stated during a trial-within-trial before Justice Charles Agbaza of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court that the defendants made their extrajudicial statements voluntarily and under caution.

Dasuki and the three others are being prosecuted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on a 32-count charge bordering on breach of trust and dishonesty to the tune of ₦33,200,000,000 (Thirty-Three Billion, Two Hundred Million Naira).

Justice Agbaza had ordered the trial-within-trial following objections by counsel to the second and fourth defendants, Richard Ebie and A.O. Ayodele, respectively, who challenged the admissibility of their clients’ extrajudicial statements on the grounds that they were not voluntarily made, and were therefore inconsistent with Sections 15(4) and 17(3) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA).

The witness, an investigator with the EFCC, while being led in evidence by prosecution counsel, Rotimi Jacobs, SAN, told the court that he recorded the statement of the second defendant as contained in Exhibits TWTA1 to TWTA7, including TWTA4. He affirmed that the statement was written at an EFCC office in the presence of his team members and other staff of the Commission, and that the defendant made the statement voluntarily after being duly cautioned.

During cross-examination, counsel to the second defendant, Solomon Umoh, SAN, asked whether there were visitation records of staff of Acacia Holdings Limited to the defendant while in EFCC custody. The witness answered in the affirmative.

When further asked whether video or CCTV recordings were made while the second defendant wrote his statement, the witness responded in the negative, stating that the law did not require such recording. He, however, added that there was CCTV coverage at the time, noting that the incident occurred about 10 years ago.

Counsel to the fourth defendant, A.O. Ayodele, also questioned why the witness did not append his signature on the dotted lines of the statement. In response, the witness stated that his signature was not a legal requirement, but noted that his handwriting appeared on the document.

Justice Agbaza adjourned the matter until May 15 and 29, 2026, for the defence to open its case.

Dele Oyewale
Head, Media & Publicity
April 22, 2026

Hot this week

₦2.7bn Fraud: Court Jails Former Banker for 39 Years

Justice O. O. Abike-Fadipe of the Special Offences Court...

Sting Operation at Applewood Estate and Matters Arising

Operatives of the Lagos Zonal Directorate 1 of the...

Bello’s ₦110.4bn Trial: EFCC Traces Kogi LG Funds to Company Linked to Adaudu

An operative of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission...

EFCC Witness: Arik Air Owed No Debt to Union Bank, Receivership Was Fraudulent

The Director of the Lagos Zonal Directorate 2 of...

Topics

₦2.7bn Fraud: Court Jails Former Banker for 39 Years

Justice O. O. Abike-Fadipe of the Special Offences Court...

Sting Operation at Applewood Estate and Matters Arising

Operatives of the Lagos Zonal Directorate 1 of the...

Bello’s ₦110.4bn Trial: EFCC Traces Kogi LG Funds to Company Linked to Adaudu

An operative of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission...

EFCC Witness: Arik Air Owed No Debt to Union Bank, Receivership Was Fraudulent

The Director of the Lagos Zonal Directorate 2 of...

Olukoyede Now a Fellow of MINILS

The Michael Imoudu National Institute for Labour Studies (MINILS),...

KC Luxury Arrives in Court in Ambulance, Seeks Medical Bail

Businessman and social media influencer Afolabi Michael Kazeem, popularly...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img